Tag-Archive for » text «
England 1 – 0 Slovenia.
A bravely hard-fought victory?
A superb performance to qualify from the group stage?
Well that depends on what channel you were watching the match on – or more accurately, which punditry team you watched after the event. The BBC (England) and RTE (Ireland) seemed not only to be watching a different match, but a different sport….
Alan Hansen: “Once England got the goal the confidence levels surged, they were excellent.”
Eamon Dunphy: “They just didn’t grow in confidence at all after the goal.”
Gary Lineker: “The goal really settled them, didn’t it? They pushed on from there.”
Ronnie Whelan: “You’d think they’d have kicked on from when they scored, but they actually got worse.”
Roy Hodgson: “England’s crossing has been absolutely outstanding.”
John Giles: “Some of the crossing was just awful.”
Lee Dixon: “A great performance.”
Dunphy: “Shocking…absolutely incredibly bad…pretty awful stuff.”
Lineker: “He looked more like the Rooney we know.”
Whelan: “Rooney is a major worry, his form, his body language, his demeanour, everything.”
Dixon: “Gerrard was outstanding.”
Dunphy: “I can’t believe how bad Gerrard was today.”
Harry Redknapp: “Across midfield we were top drawer.”
Giles: “Barry got worse as the game went on, Milner, Gerrard and Lampard the same.”
Redknapp: “Bring it on! Whoever we play we’ll be difficult to beat.”
Whelan: “If they don’t improve they’ll go straight out, it was a very, very inept performance.”
Got this from the boss today – am delighted. I never knew he held me in such high regard. That new job is definitely in the bag now…
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION
1 Steve Healy, in our team of software developers, is always
2 hard at work at his desk. Steve works independently, without
3 wasting company time talking to colleagues. Steve never
4 thinks twice about assisting fellow employees, and he always
5 finishes given assignments on time. Often he takes extended
6 measures to complete his work, sometimes skipping coffee
7 breaks. Steve is a dedicated individual who has absolutely no
8 vanity in spite of his high accomplishments and profound
9 knowledge in his field. I firmly believe that Steve can be
10 classed as a high-calibre employee, the type that cannot be
11 dispensed with. Consequently, I truly recommend that Steve be
12 promoted to senior management, and a proposal will be
13 executed as soon as possible.
Edit: It’s been pointed out to me that there is something a bit ‘off’ about this letter. Something about only reading the odd-numbered lines? I don’t get it…


